Thursday, November 26, 2009

Vendors That Offer ERP for Services in SaaS Business Models

To facilitate the ERP initiatives of SMB organizations in the services sector, there are a number of vendors that have leveraged the SaaS business model. Keep in mind that the majority of organizations benefiting from this model fall within the category of lower midsized and small organizations. Vendors that fit the bill include the following:

* Sage offers a SaaS option in both its Accpac and MAS product lines. Sage Accpac online provides SMB organizations with Sage Accpac 100 ERP for small organizations and Sage Accpac 200 ERP for midsized environments through an on demand model. Both products offer a solid accounting package for both market segments. However, they are not as strong in areas such as CRM and PSA. In addition, Sage MAS 500 delivers a stronger SaaS offering because of its application service provider (ASP) partnership with IBM. Lastly, MAS 500 delivers a more complete PSA offering for project-centric organizations.

* Intuit delivers ERP-like functionality primarily for smaller organizations via its QuickBooks online offering. Through its strategic relationships with salesforce.com and Projector PSA , QuickBooks delivers basic ERP functionality specific to very small professional services organizations over the Internet at an affordable price.

* Intacct offers a SaaS financial package for the SMB marketplace. Through its technology partnership with Openair, one of the leading niche PSA players, Intacct delivers a fully integrated ERP suite. Moreover, Openair's original equipment manufacturer (OEM) relationship with Intacct offers best-of-breed functionality in PSA and accounting, making it an excellent contender to NetSuites ERP solution.

* NetSuite is likely the best example of a fully integrated ERP system offered through a SaaS model for the SMB market. Delivering complete back-office (accounting, human resources [HR], purchasing, financials, etc.) and powerful CRM capabilities, NetSuite offers users a fully integrated, Web-based solution in a single source code. Its capabilities are better suited for the services sector, such as professional services organizations, nonprofits, and advertising, with modules in financials, CRM, purchasing, payroll, and inventory. However, portfolio management and resource management capabilities critical to project-centric organizations are not as strong as those delivered by niche PSA vendors.

* Microsoft offers its range of ERP solutions through its Dynamics product line. Dynamics SL is Microsofts PSA solution that provides complete project accounting capabilities. Dynamics GP offers a light ERP system that delivers mostly back-office functionality. For larger organizations, Dynamics AX offers stronger back-office capabilities with the deeper ERP functionality required for more complex organizations, such as those in the upper mid and enterprise markets. Microsoft delivers its SaaS model for these products through its SPLA partner program, which allows service providers to deliver Microsoft solutions through an online subscription model.

* SAP offers its Business One ERP solution for the SMB market. Although better suited for the distribution and manufacturing industries, Business One delivers strong back-office and CRM functionality to the services sector. As for the companys SaaS offering, SAP provides its partners with the option of holding licenses and having their users pay a subscription fee to access an online, hosted version of Business One.

* Oracle delivers its ERP offering to the SMB market with its Oracle eBusiness Suite Special Edition. Similar to SAP, Oracle's SMB offering is stronger for the distribution and manufacturing sectors. In terms of delivering solid back-office and CRM capabilities, Oracle is worth considering for SMB organizations in the services sector. From a SaaS point of view, Oracle has a well developed on demand program to host its ERP applications. However, Oracle has not yet fully embraced the SaaS model, and the vendors clients are still required to purchase licenses and maintenance for its applications.

"ERP for SMB"? Or "Accounting on Steroids"

Since the recent rise in popularity of SaaS and the entrance of tier one vendors into the SMB market, the ERP acronym has extended its definition to include accounting and financial software vendors that have serviced this market segment since the eighties. Leading vendors such as Sage, Intuit, and Microsoft have taken advantage of ERP's expanded definition. These vendors have branded their accounting solutions as ERP for SMBs by delivering an integrated offering through a SaaS business model. Microsoft has its Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA) partner program to deliver its SaaS offering, whereas Sage and Intuit have online subscription models for a number of their products. The SaaS business model has enabled vendors to deliver affordable, integrated ERP solutions to SMBs simply by providing add-on components to their accounting packages. Hence, SMB service organizations are presented with a variety of options offered from basic accounting solutions that can quickly deliver ERP solutions by leveraging the Internet as the platform of choice. QuickBooks' Online Edition exemplifies this point by allowing the smallest of service organizations to subscribe to its service. Quickbooks provides SMBs the option to include online add-ons that can integrate salesforce.com for CRM and Projector PSA for their project time and billing requirements, thereby delivering a seamless ERP offering. Although by no means will QuickBooks identify itself as an ERP solution, nevertheless, QuickBooks' SaaS model empowers small organizations to build a solution that can meet most of their business needs.

The ubiquity of the Internet has opened the ERP door to many vendors that have not had access to this market before. By leveraging the Internet, the SaaS model has allowed software vendors that specialize in back-office systems to embrace the ERP acronym. The definition of ERP has broadened to include all integrated systems that automate and streamline an organizations operations. Formerly, ERP systems focused specifically on delivering enterprise-wide solutions to large manufacturing organizations; today, users are faced with the challenge of sifting through the ever growing pool of solutions branded ERP. As a result, this has left user organizations with a wide range of systems that pitch ERP solutions, but these systems may or may not provide fully integrated functionality to support users' business requirements. In the SMB world, systems range from full-blown ERP systems (like NetSuite) to basic accounting systems (like Quickbooks). Although labels can be misleading, at the end of the day, users need to be diligent in determining their business requirements to find the solution that fits best.

ERP for Services: Integrated Versus Best-of-Breed

Today's ERP for services marketplace has upped the ante in delivering affordable, fully integrated ERP systems. The rising popularity of SaaS as a delivery model has pitted integrated ERP systems against best-of-breed solutions for SMB organizations in the services sector. SaaS has "leveled the playing field" among integrated ERP solutions like NetSuite and niche ERP and professional services automation (PSA) players like Openair and QuickArrow by providing an affordable delivery model and eliminating the complexities of on-site implementations. In light of this, niche ERP and PSA players are faced with the challenge of developing strategies that provide end-to-end solutions for their clients in order to compete with full-blown ERP systems. A number of PSA vendors have developed SaaS partnerships in order to deliver competitive ERP offerings. In fact, PSA vendor OpenAir exemplifies this strategy by delivering a seamless, integrated ERP offering in conjunction with accounting vendor Intacct. Consequently, SaaS has empowered a number of vendors to deliver affordable, integrated ERP solutions through both single and multiple offerings by reducing the risk and cost typically associated with large scale ERP implementations.

Defining SOA and SaaS

At a high level, SOA is a technological platform that organizations employ to standardize the interaction and collaboration of disparate applications. Although this can be achieved through various means, web services have become popular methods employed by ERP for services vendors when implementing an SOA framework. Numerous organizations implement SOA in which web applications interact with each other with standard protocols that can include extensible markup language (XML) running over hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), universal description, discovery, and integration (UDDI), and simple object access protocol (SOAP). The benefits of SOA include a cost-efficient way of responding to changes in an organization by reusing services to modify business processes as needed without re-architecting entire systems. In addition, the incremental modular deployment and platform independence of an SOA framework is another advantage that is commonly promoted by vendors.

From a cost and benefit point of view, the SaaS business model delivers similar advantages to the SMB marketplace. By leasing software from vendors as needed via the Internet, organizations can implement a full-blown ERP system in a cost-effective manner. Similar to an SOA philosophy, SaaS enables SMB organizations to quickly implement or modify applications by using the Internet as a single source (platform) to run their businesses. The main difference lies in the management of an organization's infrastructure and applications. For vendors offering ERP for services, SOA is typically designed for organizations to manage their ERP systems internally. SaaS, on the other hand, is fully managed remotely by the vendor delivering the ERP system to SMB organizations, many of which do not have the expertise, infrastructure, or financial means to manage these systems themselves.

Enterprise Resource Planning for Services: Has Software as a Service Become Service-oriented Architecture for Small to Medium Businesses

In a market where labels define software vendors, the power of the enterprise resource planning (ERP) acronym has permeated the small to medium business (SMB) market. Tier one and best-of-breed vendors are embracing the ERP label as the message of choice to its clients, especially in the services sector where ERP is less mature. As organizations seek enterprise solutions to meet their business requirements, they are faced with the challenge of deciphering which solutions best suit their needs.

Everywhere one turns, a services component is incorporated into the latest and greatest offering pitched by ERP vendors. For many vendors targeting the enterprise market, service-oriented architecture (SOA) is the technology of choice; for those targeting the SMB market, software as a service (SaaS) is the technology of choice. These new approaches to selling ERP solutions are claimed to be more efficient, affordable, and simpler ways to reduce costs and address integration issues common in company-wide ERP implementations. By leveraging the Internet, the services model offered by SOA and SaaS has made ERP more attractive to all market segments.

In the past, smaller organizations would not consider ERP initiatives due to ERPs exorbitant costs. ERP implementations were associated with multimillion dollar engagements that demanded the support of a team of consultants that was hired to overhaul an organization's entire information technology (IT) infrastructure and operational systems. The entire process would be spread out over many months, and in some cases, years. With the recent trend of software vendors offering SaaS business models, ERP implementations have become a viable solution for even the smallest of organizations. SaaS has empowered small businesses to reap the benefits of full-blown ERP systems without the costs of maintaining a comprehensive IT infrastructure or the initial investment of purchasing software licenses. Consequently, ERP initiatives have recently piqued the interest of SMB organizations in a number of service sectors.

Vendor Positioning

The following represents a general listing of vendors within the CDI industry and their product functionality. This list is in no way comprehensive, and organizations should use this as a general guide rather than a potential vendor short list.

* Siperian Hub is a complete, integrated software platform for customer-centric master data management that creates real-time unified views of customers, organizations, and products, from disparate data silos. This allows organizations to create a unified customer view and framework. Siperian's solution is broken down into three separate modules. Siperian Master Reference Manager (MRM) is used to consolidate multiple customer profiles in order to identify customers uniquely across all channels of the organization. Some key features of MRM are template-driven data models, rules-based modules that are configurable, and built-in audit and historical lineage functionality. Siperian Hierarchy Manager (HM) creates a unified view of the multiple relationships that exist among customers and other entities across all applications to provide organizations with a consistent, complete view of the customer. Some key features include the ability to configure and to manage data relationship consolidation, rules and metadata maintenance for relationship unification across all organizational sources, and exception-handling capabilities. The third module, Siperian Activity Manager (AM), allows organizations to create relevant customer views that drive business actions based on the transactional data captured in the hub and distributed via analytical and operational activities.

* Oracle's Siebel Customer Data Integration is comprised of three solutions: Universal Application Network, Data Quality, and Universal Customer Master. Oracle's Siebel Data Quality identifies duplicate customer records and provides pre-built integration to third-party data cleansing tools. Oracle's matching server functionality allows the organization to search, match, and identify duplicate customer records based on key customer attributes such as name and address. The data quality connector provides real-time and batch request capabilities that connect to an external data cleansing engine to eliminate duplicate customer records. Additional features of Oracle Siebel include pre-built integration functionality, and fuzzy searching for identifying variations in spelling and word sequence.

* IBM, with its acquisition of DWL on August 31, 2005, provides a real-time transactional CDI solution. WebSphere Customer Center provides multiple interfaces to front- and back-office systems to access and manage a complete customer master record. It focuses on customer-data transaction management that is operational in nature, and its customer hub provides approximately 500 out-of-the-box services. IBM's CDI solution is implemented within a service-oriented architecture (SOA) and its business services, to help manage and maintain customer data. The CDI solution is a part of the IBM Master Data Management (MDM) suite of products, and integrates with IBM Information Integration and Entity Analytics products.

* Initiate Systems provides CDI solutions to organizations to help control customer interactions related to sales, service, and customer relations. The Initiate Identity Hub software system focuses on CDI, enterprise master person index (EMPI), and entity resolution. It also leverages customer data in real time and enables organizations to find any data set, account, or transaction, based on person, household, or organization. The Initiate Identity Hub software also links duplicate and fragmented records within and across disparate data sources. Initiate Systems has several additional software components to complement the hub, and provides a complete CDI solution. Initiate's Data Federation compiles data maintained outside of the Initiate Identity Hub software, allowing organizations to overcome security restrictions that prevent a complete customer view. Initiate Synchronization functions as the central management point for all customer data, in order to keep data accurate. Initiate Data Profiling Report Pack helps monitor and improve data quality so that organizations can identify and understand the impact of data on business operations within the organization. Initiate Enterprise Integrator provides distributed access to the searching and linking capabilities offered by Initiate Identity Hub. With the integrator, the capabilities of legacy and operational applications can be extended to provide data integration services at the point of service, enabling customization and deployment at any stage of the enterprise that requires accurate customer identification.

* DataFlux's CDI solution works by aggregating information from disparate applications, databases, and customer touch points into one centralized data source using an SOA. Using a combination of data quality and identity management technology, the DataFlux CDI Solution creates a master data reference file to consolidate information, and then feed those records and update information within a database or application as needed. Data problems are inspected and analyzed before being migrated to the CDI repository. Also, the results of the analysis are used to build targeted data quality routines to correct, standardize, and validate customer data. Some main features of the DataFlux CDI Solution include data profiling, access to multiple data sources, connection and access to multiple data sources to allow for easy and timely analysis, and matching and de-duplication functionality.

CDI and Data Integration

CDI represents a consolidated view of customer data. Aside from MDM, which looks at the whole organization, data integration generally focuses on specific initiatives, and is the type of software used to perform data transfers, consolidations, etc. Thus, when an organization is looking to implement a CDI initiative, its focus should involve identifying the data integration vendors that specialize in CRM or that focus specifically on validating and consolidating customer data.

Data integration is defined as the act of bringing together or moving data from one or multiple locations to a centralized or replicated data store. The development of a data warehouse and the consolidation of information across the organization is an example of how data integration is applied in organizations. Sub-sets of data from disparate locations within the organization are loaded into the centralized structure of a data warehouse or dedicated database. This centralized structure creates a specified view of data to measure an organization's performance, to generate reports, to provide analytics, and so forth.

Not all data integration is equal when it comes to CDI. Different forms of data integration are used within different industries and for diverse initiatives. For example, when implementing a business intelligence (BI) solution, data mapping, data cleansing, and hourly data loads are likely the most important factors to consider. Also, different vendors within the data integration space may specialize in sub-categories such as data quality, and may partner with larger industry- or solution-specific vendors to have their solutions embedded within larger software packages. This gives organizations the ability to mix and match solutions based on their needs.

Customer Data Integration: A Primer

Implementing a customer data management system can be the difference between success and failure in terms of leveraging an organization's customer relationship management (CRM) system. Since customers drive profitability, organizations need a way to provide their employees with a single view of the customer and to provide that customer with above-average customer service. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Disparate applications such as billing and call center systems do not always feed into one another, and even when they do, lack of data cleansing and management can cause employees to see only a portion of a customer's history, interactions, or profiles. A widely used example is that of an organization sending multiple marketing brochures to one customer because of inaccuracies and lack of customer data synchronization. A more alarming example is having more than one customer record for a specific customer, with the collections department calling that customer to collect on an account that is actually current.

Why do CRM initiatives fail? Because implementing a system to manage customers does not guarantee that CRM applications will work successfully within the organization. The old adage—"garbage in, garbage out,"—definitely applies to the realm of CRM. If organizations do not have clean, reliable, centralized data, their customer view will not be complete or accurate, and their business goals will not be achieved. Consequently, customer data integration (CDI) has become an essential component of an organization's management of data, along with any CRM initiative.

This article will provide an overview of CDI within CRM, and see how it differentiates itself from the general data integration industry. Additionally, the components of CDI will be explored, to identify the important areas that should be considered when implementing master data management (MDM) for CRM within the organization. Finally, key vendors in the industry and their key product features will be identified.

Defining Customer Data Integration

Within CRM, CDI is the management and consolidation of customer information from across the organization. This includes, but is not limited to, information stored in call centers, sales and marketing departments, and accounts receivables and payables. CDI ensures that each department requiring customer contact has access to timely data, to provide employees with a complete view of customer profiles or histories. This creates a standardized view of each customer and promotes positive customer interactions.

Most enterprise organizations have built or acquired their computer applications over an extended period of time, creating a series of complex systems that work independently or that interoperate with one another. Even if these systems have high interoperability, many times the business rules and data structures of each application and business unit have not been taken into account, as they were developed independently of one another. This means that data may be captured in different ways. For example, customer address information and name may be recorded in different formats within different business units. When data is pulled from one system to another, this particular customer information may not be synchronized.

Inspire commitment to the vision.

This step is the last piece to the puzzle. What needs to be done to achieve commitment from your employees? By this time, if you have applied the ideas in the previous steps, your employees are seeing a lot of new behaviors and actions, and they are well aware that something is happening. The challenge is to ensure that they see the opportunity in this change for themselves and, as a result, become committed to the vision.
According to Gartner, every organization going through change experiences a stratification of its employee base, represented by those who will be a) early adopters of the vision, b) an early majority of followers, c) a late majority of followers, and finally, d) laggards who may or may not buy in to the vision at all. However, with attention to a commitment strategy, leaders can skew these groupings to achieve a greater number of early adopters and early majority of followers. As such, organizations must understand what needs to be done to build commitment to the CRM vision. Here are a few points to consider:

1. Build a path toward achieving competency.

Employees need to know how to achieve the vision. They need to understand their role in the relationships with the client and the organization as described in the vision. They need to know how they, personally, will be adding value to the organization by embracing the vision, and they need clarity on the goals they must achieve if the vision is to be attained.

2. Build a sense of comfort into the employee group by ensuring this is pursued as a team vision.

That means everyone in the organization has a part to play in achieving the vision. If the CRM program becomes "just a sales program," it will create a great deal of tension and discomfort in the organization, because it will be seen as another management "flavor of the month" (popular but quickly passing) project. If this is the case, it will be communicated back to your customers as such.

Employees need to feel that the vision is attainable. Ensure that the leadership team constantly talks about the possibilities and continually displays the appropriate behaviors and actions. Celebrate successes in the team as they are achieved.

3. Create an environment of stability.

Employees need to know that leaders are confident in the vision yet empathetic to employee and customer issues. Leaders need to stop negativity, particularly within their own ranks. Negativity that is observed in employee ranks needs to be addressed with understanding, as people typically are fearful of change. Reaffirm the vision—why the relationship between customers, employees, and the organization is important; what the expected outcomes are; and why the vision will be good on a personal level for everyone involved. Take the vision out of the clouds and make it real for the employees. Do this as often as needed.

4. Build and deploy a solid communication strategy.

Ensure that employees receive valuable information frequently. Each one is part of the team, and should not be surprised by changes or issues.

Employees need to see managers and leaders as trustworthy and candid. Ensure that formal messages fit with informal dialogue from team and organizational leadership.

Make certain that employees have the opportunity to meet with managers and CRM leaders frequently. Employees will need to be a part of the vision and the solution. That means communications must go beyond e-mail. Remember: it's all about people, and people need relationships in order to be committed to actions. Leaders and managers should pursue all opportunities to meet employees in small groups to engage in conversation and address whatever issues may be of concern.

Role-model relationship-building behaviors.

We've all heard the old saying "You need to walk the talk." Well, it's true. When it comes to the leaders supporting the CRM vision, behaviors must reflect the importance placed on relationships. If you are looking for commitment from your people, nothing speaks louder than your actions. Reflect upon the following questions, and use these as discussion items within the CRM leadership team:

1. What are our values as a leadership team in terms of how we develop and maintain relationships with our customers and employees?

2. How do our values translate into behaviors and actions? What does the leadership team need to model?

3. How will we prioritize business decisions based on these values?

4. Are we willing to be held accountable to our customers and to our employees regarding our display of these values? How will this accountability manifest?

5. Are we willing to admit that we make mistakes? Are we open to receiving feedback from customers and employees regarding our behavior and our actions in the building and sustaining of relationships?

Here's an example of a company that I believe takes the list above to heart.

Support the vision with a culture of CRM possibility.

If the relationship-based vision is to be achieved, it is essential that the team—the company's employees, managers, and executives—are on board to develop and sustain the relationships described in the vision. Again, technology, strategic plans, marketing, and sales goals are all important, but the emotional commitment of the people involved is what determines whether the organization will be successful in attaining the CRM vision.

Too often, clients are presented with marketing material promoting a company's new "customer-friendly vision," only to be treated like intruders once they step inside the organization. Many companies make huge investments in creating a CRM vision, goal statements, policies, and procedures, along with subsequent new technology, only to have frontline staff, call center personnel, and sales professionals demonstrate little enthusiasm for customers.

The culture of the organization must support the concept that relationships are important and that they actually form the CRM vision. Look at what your organization is doing to move in this direction. Don't fall into the trap of thinking this factor is too "soft" to be a critical business strategy. Think about the relationship: why should customers buy from you when they can buy virtually the same product or service from someone else? Why should employees care about your customer if they don't have some type of enhanced relationship with the company to motivate them to do so.

Start with the relationship.

Where does the vision of the CRM-focused organization begin? It starts with an understanding of what the relationship needs to be. That is, the relationship between the organization, its employees, and the customer. This is a triangulated, inter-dynamic relationship, and one that will be tested with every transaction, inquiry, and corporate decision. The vision starts with a picture of the relationship taken from a behavioral standpoint. Consider the following questions:

* What does the future relationship look like—to customers, employees, management, and executives? Can you describe this relationship from each of these stakeholders' point of view?

* What is the desired customer behavior in the new relationship? What would the customer's ideal behavior look like? Is it different for different customer groups?

* What critical behaviors must the company, including executives, managers, and employees, demonstrate in order to promote and sustain the desired customer behaviors? How can current behaviors provide a catalyst for desired customer behaviors? Where is the gap between the two?

Those who are leading the CRM program and who are responsible for the creation of the vision must describe the vision in terms of people and possibilities. Leaders must refrain from focusing the vision on numbers or the type of technology that will be employed, as these are but the results and the tactics that stem from the vision.

To illustrate what I mean, consider the following experience I had working with an executive team from a major technology company.

The team was in the midst of creating a new corporate-wide, customer-centric vision for the transformation of the company's consulting practice. The goal was to create a new vision that would build greater customer reach and ultimately lead to activities that drive more consulting engagements. My job was to facilitate the process and provide coaching as needed.

The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships

When it comes to the creation of a customer relationship management (CRM) vision that truly serves to enhance the customer experience, so many organizational leaders are trapped within their own understanding of what that vision entails. Consider the following statistic: of all CRM programs initiated, roughly 70 percent involve a great solution but a bad implementation plan, resulting in poor return on capital employed (ROCE) and, equally important, a negative CRM experience for all parties involved.

What does this mean?

Companies have a fundamental lack of understanding of what makes for a true CRM vision. The vision that drives the CRM program must embrace the picture of a new, enhanced customer experience—that is, a new relationship.

Therefore, the vision is not about the technology being used or the quantitative measurement of the number of customer transactions occurring. Sure, these elements are important, but they should be viewed as supporting factors or consequences of the vision, not the vision itself.

As a result of these misguided notions and subsequent CRM visions, the "new" customer experience is flat, or even unnoticeable. Further, the value derived by the company becomes mediocre at best, and CRM is given the undeserved bad reputation of not being able to deliver.

Following are four steps to develop an effective and attainable CRM vision.

The Influence of SOX on FS

Within the FS industry, compliance regulations are becoming extremely important, if not critical. Many North American organizations must comply with SOX. Under SOX, executives must sign off on all financial statements, which have to comply with strict regulations and be monitored with a process control.

There are several key indicators organizations have to take into consideration when aiming for SOX success. These indicators are collaboration, security, control, iteration, adaptation, and measurability.

Collaboration involves employees across departments or offices, as well as external people, working together to collect data, consolidate data, put together financial reporting, and provide accurate financial statements.

Various levels of security must allow or restrict users' access to data, such that only management has the ability to sign off on tasks within a workflow. The security can be either user- or role-defined.

Controls that are mandatory under SOX are established, in part, through the afore-mentioned security system. A BPM solution, however, can contribute to these controls through its capability of showing a user only the information necessary for that user's authorization level in a particular workflow step.

Because financial statements must be audited, the ability to iterate processes is essential. Electronic, automated processes can bring consistency to processes every time they are used.

As rules and regulations change, an organization's processes must be able to adapt to these changes. A BPM solution should enable the organization to quickly change business processes in order to adapt to new conditions and to the market.

Lastly, in order to meet SOX regulations and financial industry standards, it is important to have a solution that is capable of measuring and tracking all financial data and of illustrating the processes and controls surrounding those numbers. A BPM solution is the perfect solution to these criteria for the financial industry.

The FS Industry

The FS industry is one of the industries that are focusing on BPM solutions, and BPM vendors have responded by providing industry-specific functionality.

Within FS, we can talk about banking, insurance, credit card companies, securities, etc. These organizations are under intense competitive pressure and, thus, are constantly trying to improve their operations and to respond to dynamic market demands. FS organizations have implemented several enterprise solutions over the last few years and encountered mixed results. These solutions include customer relationship management (CRM), the year 2000 (Y2K) problem, and anti-fraud initiative solutions, as well as business improvement and competitive advantage applications.

One problem that keeps arising is that applications often are not integrated with each other or are not being used on an enterprise-wide basis. This makes it hard for companies to streamline business processes that are specific to the organization's changing needs. FS companies must be able to design the processes so as to increase productivity within the organization. To do this, it must be possible to adjust processes so that they match an organization's needs as they evolve in an ever-changing environment. For FS companies, these needs may include complying with regulations such as the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), acquiring new customers faster, improving efficiency, integrating processes with legacy systems, automating manual processes, analyzing processes for risk management, improving exception handling, and decreasing the number of bottlenecks.

BPM vendors play to these industry requirements. Vendors allow companies to design processes within their solution in order to manage their resources in a structured manner. Through the BPM solutions that they offer, vendors also help FS organizations achieve compliance, reduce risks, keep or acquire new customers, and link different vertical applications together to become more efficient.

How Is Business Process Management Applicable to Financial Services

Business Process Management (BPM) is increasingly being used by organizations to improve internal processes in order to make them more efficient. But which processes are appropriate for BPM? Which industry, if any, has successfully deployed BPM?

BPM in Vertical Markets

BPM is already used in a variety of markets, from financial services and government to healthcare and manufacturing. In fact, vendors have different forms and workflows for each industry that companies can use as the basis for their BPM solution and that they can customize to their specific needs or structure in order to optimize their processes.

This customization is, in fact, fairly simple as BPM solutions are designed in such a way that business analysts are capable of doing most of the process development, thereby limiting the need for programming skills. BPM solutions enable analysts to design work flows, process flows, forms, and maps using the process designer.

Despite this, many organizations have focused on implementing vertical solutions, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) and customer relationship management (CRM). BPM, in contrast, spans the entire enterprise. Nonetheless, despite BPM's seemingly horizontal applicability across industries and enterprises, many organizations might benefit from industry-specific, or vertical, BPM solutions. This article focuses on such solutions within the financial services (FS) industry.

Core BPM Components

BPM is made up of a wide range of components. Most of these components are industry-independent and can integrate with different legacy systems. The core components include the process designer, the actual process engine, and the interface component.

The process designer component is where the process developers or business analysts design business processes. Every process for which the BPM solution is used, and every form within these processes, will be designed using this component. In addition, the process designer can often facilitate integration with other components and systems that integrate within the scope of the process and workflow, as well as towards any business rules associated with the process.

The process engine component is used to authenticate and authorize users. In order to do so, it either stores the information in its own database or is able to connect to external applications or directories where user information is being stored. If organizations are already using other authentication and authorization tools, the process engine can duplicate and synchronize the authentication and authorization process to make it more efficient and to reduce the risk of failures.

Finally, the interface component enables users to access the BPM solution through a variety of applications and interfaces, such as browsers, portals, e-mail, etc.

Besides these core components, BPM can have components that contain industry-specific information, such as rules builders, form builders, and analyses.

AnyDoc Customer Success Story: PSCU Financial Services Can’t Dispute the Advantages of OCR

Case Study Description
PSCU Financial Services mediates disputes between its customers and their credit card companies. Many of these disputes require multiple pages of documentation as evidence—which need to be scanned. Its scanning process was draining its resources and PSCU knew it was time to get automated. Since deploying OCR for AnyDoc (an optical character recognition solution), PSCU has realized an annual savings of $125,000 (USD).

Related Topics: Credit and Collections, Documentation, Forms Management, Scanning

Related Industries: Credit Intermediation and Related Activities, Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other Financial Investments and Related Activities

Related Keywords: AnyDoc, OCR, return on investment, value-added services, financial services, PSCU Financial Services, optical character recognition, automated processing, credit card companies, document preparation

CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry

The 1933 Glass-Steagal Act that prohibited the alliance of banks, securities firms, and insurance companies was repealed in November of 1999. Its repeal is creating opportunities for CRM vendors as well as for financial services firms. Competitive pressures over the past 11 months have forced financial services firms to broaden and reorganize their product offerings around the needs of the customer. The reorganization also brings the need for these large organizations to collect and share customer data across divisions and other organizations. This has created a demand for CRM applications that can meet the specific business requirements of firms in the financial services industry. Siebel Systems, Broadbase Software, and E.piphany have supplied applications to the financial services industry for some time, but the increased demand for CRM applications and rising competition has led to new business developments for each of these vendors.

Siebel Systems
Siebel Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: SEBL) recently agreed to acquire Janna Systems to enhance its Siebel Financial Services e-business product. Janna has developed CRM software for the financial services industry since its inception in 1990. Janna's strengths are in contact management and web-based self-service. Siebel's eFinance product currently provides strong call center and lead management functionality and the addition of Janna's web-based self-service in particular will broaden Siebel's operational CRM offerings for financial organizations. In a recent press release Siebel indicated that Janna technology would be a fully integrated part of Siebel Financial Services 2001, which will be commercially available sometime next summer.

E.piphany
E.piphany, Inc. (Nasdaq: EPNY) recently partnered with Deloitte Consulting to deliver industry specific applications for customer analytics and campaign management. Deloitte will develop and implement E.piphany applications customized for Fortune 500 financial services organizations. This partnership will provide the financial services industry with a strong analytical CRM product. More information about E.piphany's products can be found in TEC's analysis When You Realized the Need for a Unified View of Your Customers, that is E.piphany.

Broadbase Software
Broadbase Software, Inc. (Nasdaq: BBSW) recently partnered with HomeCom Communications, Inc. (Nasdaq: HCOM) to deliver analytical CRM applications. HomeCom is a small Internet consulting and systems integrator with vertical expertise in the financial services. HomeCom will develop and implement Broadbase applications for financial services organizations. Broadbase's strengths are in customer analytics and personalization. They also recently agreed to acquire Servicesoft to develop applications for customer service (see: Broadbase Continues to Expand).

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

The Wizardry of Business Process Management – Part 3

Part 1 of this blog series provided a lengthy discussion about business process management’s (BPM’s) necessary parts and parcels, and the software category’s value proposition. At the end of the article, I mentioned my recent attendance of a witty presentation that attempted to explain the essence of BPM via some humor and metaphor of the classic “Wizard of Oz” movie.

Namely, on March 23, 2009, Alan Trefler, Pegasystems’ founder and CEO, gave his luncheon keynote presentation at the Gartner BPM Summit in San Diego. His theme was “Don’t just Survive… Capitalize.” Trefler begun by reminding the audience that in today’s turbulent economy we are all “not in Kansas anymore” and may just need some “ruby slippers” to find our way back home to profitability. If you have 14 minutes to spare, you can re-capture the spirit of the event here.

In the main part of his presentation in Part 2, Trefler maintained that to follow the “Yellow Brick Road,” which will lead any business to Oz (and back to profitability), requires three capabilities in particular, starting with the ability to directly capture business objectives into the BPM system by the business users.It cannot be overemphasized how important it is for business users to be able to capture corporate objectives directly into the software technology so that these new objectives can immediately impact their customers, partners, and employees. The ability to easily record, erase, revise, and organize business rule changes creates the foundation for organizational agility. Letting organizations design for both planned and (even more importantly) unplanned business changes is of paramount importance.

It’s About (the “Six Rs” of) Automation, After All

Companies have to optimize their processes through technology that automatically integrates new objectives into their systems to adjust for every specific situation. They need a “brain” that ensures that processes and decisions are optimized per these new objectives in both mainstream and exceptional situations.

The idea is to get the initial process quickly and iterate later. Business users can do it one customer issue at the time, starting with any business process that needs improvement: e.g., open a new account, charge dispute, detect fraud, increase credit line, handle a missed payment, and so on.

As said in Part 2, Pegasystems (also known as Pega) users can use the familiar Microsoft Visio diagramming tool to visually create (model) the processes that will deliver better customer service. There are many pre-built solution frameworks with industry best practices to get them jump-started if necessary.

But the second brick in the Yellow Brick Road is the ability of the technology to automate all necessary computer programming. Namely, business people can draw nice pictures and diagrams to capture objectives, but if between that model of what you want and ultimately running your business you need to do lots of tedious Java or C++ programming, you cannot be agile and nimble enough. To that technical end, the model that business users create should actually automate the programming that makes the business process run.

The final brick in the Yellow Brick Road of BPM is the automation of business processes that then “drives the work to be done” by, well, automating the actual work. In other words, the work is not merely tracked or routed for human intervention, but is also completed with the power of smart automation and minimal manual effort.

Nirvana would be to ultimately automate the work for people, who then only add value as required. Although the human touch is always needed, the point of business process automation (BPA) is to eliminate any distractions.

Again stepping out of Trefler’s presentation’s narrow scope, let me try to explain here how Pega’s SmartBPM suite really turns work automation into a tool for business changes on the fly. Let’s explore the “Six Rs” of driving work to be done via Pega’s BPM technology.

As the first “R,” the BPM product makes it easy for users to receive the work that needs processing. SmartBPM has a broad ability to receive input out-of-the-box from virtually any conceivable channel.

To that end, flexible, self-expanding extensible markup language (XML)-based data structures make it easy to capture whatever data, attachments, images, or other content may be appropriate, so that users can always have the right information at hand. Web services, e-mail notifications, and so on are all treated through a common software architecture, to ensure that processes designed for one particular channel can be leveraged in a multi-channel environment.

The second “R” stands for route. To that end, rules ensure optimal work management for either people or systems by organizing related work into Cases and Folders, thus prioritizing and managing them. The duplicate checking ability prevents redundancy, while skills-based routing (SBR) optimizes work assignments.

For the third “R” of automation, report, the system offers over 100 standard reports, plus an open database to integrate with other customer information and enterprise reporting systems. Canned reporting capabilities can even be extended to include real-time business activity monitoring (BAM). For instance, built-in Service Level Agreement (SLA) management and statistical sampling provide management impacts in real time.

Customers use these capabilities to coordinate and control key business functions. For example, National Australian Bank (NAB) uses SmartBPM to control the receipt, prioritization, and execution of billions of dollars of high value payments, ensuring that every wire transfer request is handled according to the best practice.

The Exceeding “Three Rs” of BPA

But these are just the basic three “Rs” of BPA, something like the reading, writing, and arithmetic abilities in elementary school. They are the basis of what was originally called workflow automation that represents the procedural side of the world.

These days, competitive organizations need much more than the basics. To that end, PegaRULES Process Commander, a thin-client collaborative environment for both business users and IT departments, brings the further benefits and the power of automation with the additional three “Rs” that make the procedures even smarter.

Thus, the fourth “R” stands for research: the ability to dynamically get the data needed to automate work when and as needed, and use the best sources. Retrieving data if and only if it is needed saves resources and money. In addition, the system saves users’ time by only asking relevant questions and making it easy to dynamically insert alternative data sources.

Then comes the “R” for respond: the ability to reduce effort and provide service by ensuring that interactions with people are “smart.” For example, users are able to alter the forms and fields of the hypertext markup language (HTML) screens based on the rules and the situation. In addition, companies are able to notify partners, customers, and other relevant parties effectively and appropriately, and even have them directly participate in the completion of the work over the Web.

Last but not least, the sixth “R” stands for resolve: the ability to drive work through to completion with the power of an inference engine. In other words, it is the ability to fully automate work where possible and guide users if and when user involvement is needed.

The “Six Rs” of Automation in Action

Pega’s customers use these BPA capabilities to weave policies and other declarative rules into their procedures. As an illustration, let’s see how the “Six Rs” would work at an insurance call center:

1. Receive – A New York customer wants to add boat coverage to his homeowners and auto insurance plan. He or she goes to the online portal, gets partially through, but has questions about what happens if he or she moors in Maine in the summer, but brings the boat back for storage in New York in winter. He or she picks up the phone, switching from the Web to the phone channel.
2. Research – In the background, the system pre-determines that the local insurance agent is not skilled enough to write the policy for a boat moored in Maine, calculate the right policy for a commission sharing (and potential discounts), and up-sell.
3. Route – Thus, the customer profile triggers an SBR to a preferred customers queue in the call center. The right customer service representative (CSR) quickly asks a few relevant questions (e.g., near-shore or offshore sailing?) and recommends an additional multi-line coverage umbrella.
4. Resolve – The customer receives a quote to his liking and the change in policy is resolved by underwriting and a system-driven straight-through processing (STP) to be bound.
5. Respond – The customer gets an automatically generated confirmation e-mail with a print snail mail follow-up and confirmation of the change of policy and debit acknowledgement.
6. Report – The activity is monitored for ongoing process improvements and optimization via productivity and quality alerts.

The benefits of such intent-driven user experience are that it eliminates the CSR’s guesswork, since the system analyzes information on the customer history, coverage, value, prior interactions, etc., as well as the insurance provider’s business goals to determine the best course of action. Furthermore, CSRs benefit from improved effectiveness and efficiency, since the SmartBPM suite guides the agent through the interaction process and delivers the appropriate scripts, process steps, and customer information exactly when needed. In addition, Pega dynamically alters the agent experience to accommodate multiple roles (e.g., sales vs. service) and locations.

The Wizardry of Closing Execution Gaps

Going back to Alan Trefler’s luncheon presentation, in summary, he concluded that it takes the following: corporate courage (not to flinch in these times, but to instead try to see what can be done), a BPM brain (to capture the business intent), and a heart (a service oriented architecture [SOA]-based infrastructure). This creative cinematic BPM metaphor did not come out of thin air, since the presentation took place exactly on the 70th anniversary of the great “Wizard of Oz” movie.

Another salient point in Trefler’s creative speech was that the market for BPM software is driven by competitive businesses that seek to close the execution gaps that may exist between their business objectives and their actual business processes. Pega’s target customers are large, industry-leading service organizations faced with managing transaction-intensive, complex and changing processes that seek the agility needed for growth, productivity, and regulatory compliance.

Financial services organizations require software to improve the quality, accuracy, and efficiency of customer interactions and transactions processing. Pega’s customer process management and exceptions management products allow its financial service customers to be more responsive to changing business requirements. Representative Pega’s financial services customers include Bank of America, Barclays Bank, Citigroup, Credit Suisse Group, HSBC Group Holdings, JPMorgan Chase & Co., National Australian Bank (NAB), and TD Bank Financial Group.

Pega’s financial industry knowledge and experience has resulted in solutions to help these customers close execution gaps and improve the following processes:

* In Bank Card Operations: Multi-channel service; Self-service account opening; Product roll-out; Fraud processing; Customer on-boarding, etc.
* In Retail Banking: Event-driven marketing; Account opening; New product introduction; Service case management; Specialized fulfillment, etc.
* In Wholesale Banking (e.g., wire transfers and treasury management): Proactive service monitoring; Account servicing; New product introduction; Compliance trade monitoring; Exception management, etc.

For their part, healthcare organizations seek products that integrate their front-office and back-office initiatives and help drive customer service, efficiency, and productivity. Representative Pega’s healthcare customers include: Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Group Health Cooperative, HealthNow New York, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Kaiser Permanente), and Wellpoint.

Pega’s healthcare industry involvement has resulted in solutions to help these customers close execution gaps and improve the following processes: Automated Underwriting; Sales Renewals; Appeals & Grievances; Consumer Directed Healthcare (CDHC) offerings; Facilitation; Authorization Management; Small- and Large-Plan Enrollment and Servicing; Disease/Care Management, and so on.

Insurance companies, whether competing globally or nationally for customers and channels, need software to automate the key activities of policy/contract rating, quoting, customization, underwriting, and servicing as well as products that improve customer service and the overall customer experience. Representative Pega insurance industry customers include: American National Insurance Company, former American International Group (AIG) that recently changed name into American International Underwriters (AIU), John Hancock, Farmers Insurance Group, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Pega’s insurance industry knowledge and experience has resulted in solutions to help these customers close gaps and improve the following processes: automated underwriting; event-driven marketing; product cloning; claims management; legacy transformation, etc.

A CRM Provider Too?

While its customers are typically large companies in the financial services, healthcare and insurance markets, with SmartBPM Suite, Pega is also able to offer solutions to a broader range of companies and industries, such as telecommunications, government, life sciences, manufacturing, and travel services. Marquee customers here include Amgen, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), General Electric Company (GE), Ford Motor Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, and The ServiceMaster Company.

All of the abovementioned companies are largely concerned about their customer service levels. Pega’s customer interaction know-how has also resulted in solutions to close gaps and improve the following processes: Customer retention and cross-selling; Specialized fulfillment; New hire training; Post-order clean-up; Objection handling; Reducing on-call time, Product warranty and servicing management, and so on.

In fact, Pega is also regarded as a customer relationship management (CRM) provider. ZDNet’s 2007 blog post mentioned Pega within a Forrester’s CRM Wave research document. Pega does acknowledge the competition from CRM application vendors including Chordiant Software, Microsoft Dynamics CRM by Microsoft, Siebel by Oracle; Pivotal CRM by CDC Software, and Consona CRM to name but a few.

There is also competition coming from companies that provide application specific software for the financial services, healthcare, insurance, and other specific markets such as Norkom Technologies, SmartStream Technologies, SunGard, The TriZetto Group, Oracle’s solutions for financial services, Misys, etc. An interesting nugget of information is that Pega used to be a Salesforce.com on-demand CRM customer. The vendor recently made a decision to replace Salesforce.com Enterprise Edition with its own CRM system, in an “drink your own champagne” manner.

Part 4 of this blog series will provide more of Pegasystems’ value proposition and BPM secret sauce. In the meantime, your comments, thoughts, suggestions or individual experiences with BPM solutions are more than welcome. If you are SmartBPM user, I would appreciate you sharing your experiences with the product and the company.

The Wizardry of Business Process Management: Part 5

Part 1 of this blog series started a lengthy discussion about the value proposition and parts-and-parcels of business process management (BPM), with an ensuing focus on Pegasystems (also known as Pega) as one of the leading BPM suite providers. Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 then analyzed in depth a number of the vendor’s “BPM secret sauce” ingredients.

Pega is one of the leading vendors in the overall BPM software market (it has been automating business processes for more than 25 years), and it has a strong presence in the financial services, insurance, and health care markets. The vendor has been most successful competing for customers whose businesses are characterized by a high degree of change, complexity, and size.

The principal competitive factors within Pega’s market include the following:

* the BPM product’s adaptability, scalability, functionality, and performance;
* proven success in delivering cost savings and efficiency improvements;
* ease-of-use for developers, business units, and end users;
* establishment of a significant base of reference customers; and
* the ability to integrate with other products and technologies.

Taking the Customers’ Word For IT

The steady improvements in customer service and business agility should naturally lead to happier customers, more efficient operations, and higher profit margins. Pega’s BPM and customer relationship management (CRM) customers gladly talk about their typical results as follows:

* Revenue growth – an average 25 percent increase in cross-selling and up-selling; customer acquisition up 15 to 30 percent; a 50 percent decrease in application abandonment; and time-to-market (TTM) cut by 18 percent;
* Service excellence – on average US$8 million in lost profit margins recovered; a five point customer retention increase; a 30 percent increase in one-touch problem resolution; and a 20 percent increase in customer satisfaction scores;
* Operational effectiveness – a 40 percent increase in productivity; a 60 percent increase in straight-through processing (STP); a 70 percent decrease in time-to-resolution; and new-hire training cut by 60 percent.

“MIA” on the Supply Side

Pega’s product development priority is to continue expanding the capabilities of its rules-based SmartBPM Suite. The vendor intends to maintain and extend the support of its existing industry solution frameworks, and may choose to invest in additional frameworks which incorporate the latest business innovations. One major area Pega has not focused much on thus far is the “upstream” supply chain interactions with suppliers and in manufacturing.

In fact, not many commercial BPM products provide real-time insight into the manufacturing process operation. Yet the process flow modeling capability of BPM suites could allow management to not only easily identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies in the process, but also to more easily modify the process to improve productivity.

For instance, with an industrial BPM suite, companies could digitize their work processes and close the loop on performance with actual execution data. By applying BPM in manufacturing plants, companies could manage and audit their production more effectively and consistently, thus improving their conformance, compliance, throughput, and ability to deliver.

Enterprises could also empower their workforce by integrating people and their roles, and by customizing individuals’ work styles and decision-making. Astute BPM suites that focus on manufacturing could enable companies to close the loop on production process improvement, digitize good manufacturing practice (GMP) tasks, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and work instructions, take corrective action/exception management, perform Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) monitoring procedures, orchestrate high-level processes, and manage data between various disparate systems. Domain experts could be empowered to solve production problems immediately on the shop floor.

The (Missing) Supply Chain Opportunity

The business challenge, which can thus be turned into opportunity, comes from the fact that selling and fulfillment across an extended supply chain have become quite complex. Namely, the words “multiple” and “cross-channel” have become part of the complicated game, starting with multiple enterprises involved in trade, whereby each enterprise will often have multiple locations with multiple brands, divisions, and independent business units (IBUs), each with its own back-end systems, sales channels, etc.

Consequently, multiple catalogs with products or services and multiple product choices that require configuration and guided selling have long become a matter of course. Furthermore, globalization and more demanding customer expectations have resulted in the need for multiple fulfillment methods, whereby goods can be delivered from warehouses, stores, or directly from suppliers (via drop shipping), through third-party logistics (3PL) networks or the company’s own fleet, through a third-party service network, etc.

As seen in TEC’s previous article Retailing Trends—Shopping Anyway and Everywhere, Internet-based technological advancements have caused consumers to expect interchangeable multichannel (e.g., retail store, catalog, call center, commercial contractor, Web site, kiosk) inquiry, shopping, and goods return. In fact nowadays, a consumer expects a true cross-channel experience, and rightfully so, where they are able to buy something online and return it to the closest retail store for a refund, without any questions asked.

Failing to execute well in such intricate environments typically results in lower revenue growth, declining profit margins, and declining brand equity, with the all-too-common symptoms of high operating costs, inaccurate orders, and poor on-time delivery. It can also result in high stock-outs (missed sales opportunities), lower customer satisfaction, or a myriad of other problems.

Should Pega try to tackle these manufacturing and distribution markets, it would face fierce competition from Sterling Commerce, Manhattan Associates, or i2 Technologies. These vendors have recently delivered supply chain process platforms (SCPPs) that are based on BPM concepts and tools (e.g., rules engines and best practices frameworks).

Pega’s R&D Feat Continues

During 2008, Pega’s R&D expenses were approximately US$31.5 million, which is more than some competitors’ revenues, and with increased spending in R&D reported through the first half of 2009, time will only tell whether Pega will have the wherewithal to tackle other industries beyond its current service strongholds. At the end of 2008, Pega’s development group consisted of 162 people and has been supplemented by the use of contracted resources. Yet, bigger competitors are becoming even bigger, as witnessed in the recent merger of Software AG and IDS Scheer, the latter party having significant footholds amid SAP and Oracle customers.

In the short-to-mid-term, it appears that Pega’s focus is to maintain and extend the support of popular hardware platforms, operating systems, databases, and connectivity options to facilitate easy and rapid deployment in diverse IT environments. The focus of the most recent SmartBPM 5.5 product release is on showing the next generation of an integrated composition environment (ICE), with the intent to obtain faster business stakeholder buy-in and to fit more easily into existing environments, thanks to its Internet application composing capabilities.

The Federated Business Frameworks for the SmartBPM 5.5 release is comprised of four components that enable system administrators to create business processes and workflows that incorporate processes running across different operational units and departments. The tools, unveiled in late 2008, also offer a central management view of the touch points of connected applications and a unified work portal that employees can use to access newly defined processes.

The new components include the Integrated Work Manager (IWM) that a system administrator can use to view and connect SmartBPM applications across an organization and build a unifying portal. The Business Information Exchange (BIX) pulls information from multiple BPM applications and makes it available in an extensible markup language (XML) format or as database tables or delimited files for use in business intelligence (BI) systems and integrated process reporting purposes.

The remaining two new tools include the Virtual Enterprise Repository (VER) and the Autonomic Event Services (EAS) that were briefly mentioned in Part 4. The VER repository offers a library of ready to use Web services set up by system administrators. Process analysts or line of business (LOB) managers can browse the repository and incorporate services into a workflow diagram. The model can then be deployed on the SmartBPM engine.

For its part, the AES monitors the health of the total BPM system by tracking the performance of the application touch points. The software can spot and diagnose problems and send alerts to system administrators when performance falls below a preset threshold.

Also in late 2008, Pegasystems introduced what it called a cloud computing-based platform as a service (PaaS) software layer on top of the SmartBPM engine that makes it possible to replicate a process instance and deploy it to a separate business unit. This add-on layer to PegaRULES Process Commander (PRPC), which is the core of Pega’s SmartBPM suite, makes it possible to define and host multitenant instances on a single server for lines of business, departments, merged companies, or other internal clients.

Each replicated instance includes the same single sign-on (SSO), database schema, integration component, and any other object of the original. The idea behind the add-on layer is to make it possible to re-deploy processes without having to install a separate BPM engine.

So, What Else Should Pega Improve?

In May 2009, Pega announced a public cloud computing offering with Amazon Web Services and Capgemini, which addresses competitive offerings from Lombardi Software, Appian Anywhere, Collosa ProcessMaker, or Cordys Process Factory, to name but a few. Pega has also made its Application Profiler available to its customers and prospects as a free hosted service, with output as Microsoft Word documents and PRPC import rule sets. This profiler offers a wizard that allows business process owners and business analysts to directly capture requirements and objectives into a Pega SmartBPM solution.

Many competitors may point to Pega’s traditional lack of focus on small and midsize enterprises (SMEs), which is a market segment that will become the main BPM battleground sooner or later. I have seen that trend in many other enterprise applications markets, especially in enterprise resource planning (ERP), and there is no reason that BPM should not follow suit. While Pega has not traditionally focused on the SMB market space, many of its customer implementations have focused on divisional or business unit projects to automate and assist groups of 50 users or fewer.

Pega has historically derived a significant portion of its revenue from the “who’s who” customers in the financial services, insurance, and health care markets, and sales to these markets are important for the vendor’s future growth. However, competitive pressures, industry consolidation, decreasing operating margins, regulatory changes, and privacy concerns affect the financial condition of Pega customers and their willingness to buy more software. In addition, customers’ purchasing patterns for large technology projects are somewhat discretionary in these industries.

The financial services and insurance markets are undergoing intense domestic and international consolidation and financial turmoil, while consolidation has been increasing in the health care market. Consolidation and market turmoil may interrupt normal buying behavior and increase the volatility of Pega’s operating results.

In recent years, several of the vendor’s customers have been merged or consolidated, and we should only expect this to continue in the near future. Future mergers or consolidations may cause a decline in Pega’s revenues and adversely affect its future financial performance. Thus, there is some writing on the wall for Pega to look for customers in other industries, and to appeal to smaller customers across the board.

Based on the earnings results that Pega has reported over the past couple of years, the company has been able to buck the trend and grow both overall revenues and license revenues. In August 2009, the company had to increase its guidance as the company believes that both its market presence and success will continue both in its traditional core market verticals, as well as in many others where the company plays, such as government, communications, travel and hospitality, retail, and manufacturing.

This appeal to smaller enterprises might not be an easy feat in light of a raft of well-established competitors in that segment. In addition to the abovementioned SaaS BPM offerings, Global 360 recently delivered BPM capabilities that are designed for each of the three specific personas that are critical to the success of the BPM initiative. These are as follows: the Builder – the developer of the system; the End-User – business individuals using the application; and the Manager – the overseer of the system and the operation.

Persona-based BPM leverages role-based research to deliver the tools, tasks, and views to optimize the functionality of the BPM system for each persona. This tailored approach should improve the productivity of each user as they interact with the system based on their “view point,” leveraging just the capabilities they need to do their job. As a result, individual productivity can be improved and BPM projects experience faster time-to-results.

In addition, smaller enterprises might not necessarily need and appreciate Pega’s incremental, one-business-process-at-a-time approach for large service corporations. In talking to some Pega staffers, they did not appreciate my analogy of Pega as being an “SAP of the BPM market.” Well, they did like the similarity in terms of market leadership, an impressive install base, and all-encompassing suite, but the downside is the association with SAP’s (perceived) complexity.

Pega may be at a disadvantage with respect to its larger competitors, many of which have greater sales, marketing, and financial resources, more extensive geographical presence, and greater name recognition than Pega does. In addition, Pega may be at a disadvantage with respect to its ability to provide expertise outside its somewhat narrow set of target industries.

What About Geographic Expansion?

In 2008, sales to customers based outside the domestic US market represented 38 percent of Pega’s total revenue, which also begs for some improvement. Pega has its wholly owned subsidiaries based in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, India, and Australia. These offices market Pega products and render consulting and training services to customers based in North America, Europe, Mexico, India, Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore.

Apparently, coveted growth will necessitate expanded international operations in Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region, requiring additional managerial attention and increased costs. To that end, Pega might have to hire personnel to accommodate international growth, and may also enter into agreements with local distributors, representatives, or resellers. But we all know that new market penetration requires near-perfect execution and lots of time and resources to build reputation and a reference customer base.

At the end of the day, dear readers, your comments, thoughts, suggestions, or individual experiences with Pega and other BPM tools are more than welcome. What do you think about Pega’s BPM approaches and how it compares to other competitive solutions? How do you handle your processes? Manually? In an automated way? Or somewhere between (where only some processes are automated)?

CRM for the Finance and Banking Industry – Part 1

How many different systems does a bank employee use when changing a customer’s contact information? The last time I moved and had to change my address, the bank employee used two systems, asked three or four of her co-workers for help, and took about 15 minutes to do it because the information from one system did not transfer right away to the other system. It goes without saying that this was not my best experience dealing with banks, but not the worst either. Actually, having implemented business solutions in the past, I find it quite amusing when it happens because it reminds me of the “good old days” when I used to get blamed for faulty systems.

CRM-related Challenges Faced by the Financial Services Industry

Financial institutions are facing specific challenges when it comes to business software and customer relationship management (CRM) software. Let’s take a look at some of these challenges:
• Financial institutions began using software that did not include CRM functionality. Later on, they started integrating CRM products with existing software, or creating or improving existing products to include CRM functionality. In other words, different branches, divisions, etc., have different strategies and need to acquire or integrate different products.
• Banks and financial institutions can afford to invest huge amounts of money in sophisticated systems, but cannot afford to implement them by the book (this can take months—even years for multinational companies). This is why it is easier to integrate different modules of separate systems than to implement a new system that covers all CRM needs.
• Another challenge is related to laws and regulations created by local, national, and international institutions, which limit the power of financial institutions when dealing with their customers. Through legislation, governments try to protect their citizens from fiscal fraud and criminality (cyber-laundering, confidential information theft, etc.).
• Financial institutions are facing major changes in customer behavior and need to keep up with the latest technological advances. E-banking, customer portals, and mobile banking are just some of the new services customers use and software vendors need to integrate into their CRM offering.

CRM Vendors’ Response to These Challenges

More and more CRM vendors are adapting their products to the needs of companies in different industries, and finance and banking is one of them. Oracle offers its CRM On Demand Financial Services Edition; and Ciber, a major Microsoft value-added reseller (VAR), adapted Dynamics for the financial and insurance market. CDC Software offers Pivotal CRM for finance; and EZ Data also has a product created for this industry, but the company was recently acquired by EBIX Inc.

In a future blog post, I will talk about the different offerings of the CRM vendors that tried to create products for finance and banking.

Outsourcing in Latin America

The outsourcing industry has not been spared by the current conditions of global economic volatility. Indeed, it has been affected both directly and indirectly by this economic crisis. Outsourcing target markets are also suffering from severe difficulties as they struggle to recover from the crisis. This has brought about a change in the behavior of some outsourcing niche areas, and has also modified the criteria and methods that organizations apply in order to plan and make strategic decisions regarding outsourcing resources.

China and India are healthy global outsourcing destinations today, but other players have been changing their position during this difficult economic period. According to the 2009 A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index (The Shifting Geography of Offshoring), some eastern European countries have fallen from leadership positions; in contrast, some countries in the Middle East have been climbing up.

Latin American countries experienced some positional changes from 2007 to 2009, but they still preserve competitiveness in the outsourcing industry. Independently of irregular economic trends, India, China, and Malaysia are still very powerful competitors in the outsourcing market.

Undoubtedly, India and China are—and will continue to be—major players in the outsourcing arena for the next few years to come. They have achieved a powerful combination of expertise/cost/technical skills that makes them key players. This, combined with their vast pool of labor resources, represents a winning bet. The US and Canada are the main outsourcing clients for these kind of services. But European companies in countries such as Spain, England, and Germany, are also searching for other places to address their offshore outsourcing needs. Countries like Philippines and Malaysia are taking advantage of this, and have acquired importance in the outsourcing field.

Despite the global economic turbulence, Latin American countries seem to be thriving to some extent. Some major players such as Brazil, Chile, and Mexico are already common destinations for companies looking for nearshore services. But there are also new players pushing hard to gain market share, including Argentina, Costa Rica, Panama, and Uruguay.

The Latin American Players

According to the 2009 A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index, Latin America countries ranked very respectably when the following factors are taken into consideration:

* financial attractiveness
* people skills and availability
* business environment

Chile is ranked by A.T. Kearney as the outsourcing leader in Latin America, followed not far behind by Mexico and Brazil, but there are some other countries that appear to be in better positions to deliver outsourcing services:

Chile—It is no surprise that Chile appears as one of the leaders for outsourcing in Latin America. A solid infrastructure for telecommunications, investment attractiveness due to clear financial regulations, political stability, and attractive costs all make it a regular choice for outsourcing. Offering service for US and Spanish companies, it’s a very attractive choice for business process outsourcing (BPO), knowledge process outsourcing (KPO), and call center operations for very diverse industries.

Mexico—Still a common nearshore destiny for companies from the US and Canada, Mexico has maintained a stable position in the global outsourcing market. Proximity to the US and a Spanish-language consumer market with stable growth have helped Mexico maintain its position as a common destination for nearshore call center and BPO operations as well as IT outsourcing.

Brazil—This country is already a big world player in IT outsourcing. The Brazilian government has been making efforts to encourage offshoring and maintain its IT quality services and infrastructure. Brazil is also taking advantage of its large population and its efficient and skilled IT workforce to stay the course within volatile global economic conditions. Already a proven contender in the IT area, it has a growing labor force and is a stable contender in the IT offshore market.

Costa Rica—This small Central American player is growing because of its strong efforts to enroll new investors and create opportunities. Based also on its proximity to the US, it has developed a strong and skilled workforce, along with an efficient telecommunications infrastructure to improve its outsourcing services at a global level.

Argentina and Uruguay—With high education rates, these two countries have continued to develop and encourage their outsourcing services. They count on their strong, skilled, and low-cost workforces to be considered as an ideal option for services such as IT and financial services. They expect to be also important players for the large Hispanic customer service sector within the US.

Panama—Like other countries in this region, Panama is trying to take advantage of its proximity to the US, as well as of the fact that they share an important time zone. With a large bilingual community (thanks to a long relationship with the US based on the Panama Canal), it is encouraging local and global outsourcing companies to invest in outsourcing services, and is trying to consolidate a larger technically skilled workforce.


Advantages

There are some factors that have enabled some countries such as Brazil, Chile, and Mexico to maintain a competitive and stable global position regardless of the global economic crisis. Some of these factors have to do with natural features from the region:

Nearshore advantage—The US is still one of the biggest—if not the biggest—outsourcing client in the world, and proximity seems to be an important feature for many US outsourcing contractors. Cheaper travel costs due to this proximity makes them ideal for projects that need agile management and quick response. Almost all Latin American countries offer nearshore services.

Cultural affinity—Besides the nearshore advantage, Chile, Mexico, and Brazil have cultural similarities (with respect to the US) that always come into consideration when selecting an outsourcing destination. Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, as well as Argentina, have been working to create a more solid English-speaking workforce, and some Latin American outsourcing companies prepare their personnel to know and match business culture from US and European companies. And other factor is that major Latin America cities like Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Montevideo, Santiago, Mexico City, and others have a solid infrastructure in place, along with service conditions to host and carry out major business trade events.

Growing Spanish customer market—Given the growing Spanish-language market in the US, and growing outsourcing business from Spain, Latin America outsourcing companies enjoy a strong competitive advantage thanks to their ability to manage workforce teams in Spanish language. Major offshore companies in Chile, Costa Rica, Argentina, and Panama are making strong efforts to offer bilingual services and to offer an alternative to Mexico (which is regularly a common option in the outsourcing scenario). Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay, with their high education rates, are able to offer strong technical skills with bilingual characteristics.

Cost—Cost is inevitably a very important factor, and more important nowadays. According to the A.T. Kearney Index, Latin America countries have enjoyed steady numbers since 2007, despite some ups and downs.

Challenges

Latin American outsourcing companies should consider some important factors in order to not only maintain, but increase their overall presence in the outsourcing market:

Workforce—One of the great challenges for Latin America lies perhaps in maintaining and increasing the general skilled workforce for all outsourcing areas. Many Latin American countries have small populations compared with India or China, and furthermore have a relative shortage of qualified resources for the outsourcing industry. Latin America needs to address this challenge and augment the skilled workforce, as well as working on the perception that they can provide outsourcing investors with a confident human resources source. Is clear that Latin America will not be able to compete with China and India in terms of workforce volumes, but opportunities could come in attending to very special niches such as English-Spanish markets for BPO and ITO services.

Security and regulation standards—Another factor that could be an issue in some countries is related to safety and security. There may be concerns from outsourcing contractors regarding high crime rates, political issues, and regulations in some Latin American countries. These concerns could cause some organizations to reconsider sending outsourcing services to those countries.

Conclusions

In periods of economic volatility, the general trend is to send more outsourcing nearshore. This point is crucial for Latin America companies, in that they have a strong advantage to take and receive larger market share from this potential market in the US, for both the English and the steadily growing Spanish segments. However, outsourcing services must be backed up by sufficient workforce (both in terms of skill and raw numbers) to face the challenge. The ideal conditions of qualified workforce, security, and strong regulations need to be met to ensure significant benefits from this industry. In fact, given the current economic climate, as well as internal problems in Latin American countries, Latin American companies may have no alternative but to meet these ideal conditions in order not to be swept off the global outsourcing map altogether.